The difference between good and great product teams often comes down to the quality of their hiring decisions. Yet many product leaders struggle to conduct interviews that truly reveal a candidate's potential. This guide will help you move beyond surface-level questioning to gain deeper insights into candidates' capabilities, thought processes, and potential fit.
1. Talk Less, Listen More
Create space for candidates to fully develop their thoughts by resisting the urge to fill silence.
2. Don't Accept the First Answer
Great insights often come from the second or third layer of questioning - always dig deeper.
3. Pay Attention to Both What Is Said and What Is Left Unsaid
A candidate's choice of emphasis, omissions, and comfort levels with different topics can be as revealing as their direct answers.
Vague statements ("We did some research")
Glossing over difficulties ("it went smoothly")
Passive voice ("it was decided")
Generic outcomes ("everyone was happy")
Missing context ("we made changes")
Too much detail on irrelevant points
Focus on others' actions instead of their own
Technical details without business context
Process details without outcomes
Dig for Specifics When they say: "We gathered customer feedback..." Ask:
"What specific methods did you use?"
"What were the key insights from this feedback?"
"How did you validate these insights?"
Explore Decision Points When they say: "I decided to..." Ask:
"What alternatives did you consider?"
"What were the trade-offs you evaluated?"
"Who did you need to convince?"
"What data informed this decision?"
Understand Impact When they say: "It was successful..." Ask:
"How did you measure success?"
"What specific metrics improved?"
"What unexpected outcomes emerged?"
"How did this impact the broader business?"
Probe for Challenges When they say: "It was challenging..." Ask:
"What was the biggest obstacle?"
"How did you overcome it?"
"Who did you need help from?"
"What would you do differently next time?"
The "Funnel" Technique Start broad, then narrow down:
"Tell me more about that..."
"What was your specific role in..."
"Walk me through your thought process when..."
"How did you handle [specific aspect]..."
"What data supported that decision?"
The "Contrast" Technique Ask about different angles:
Before vs. After: "How did your approach change over time?"
Expected vs. Actual: "How did results compare to expectations?"
Your View vs. Others: "How did your perspective differ from the team's?"
Short-term vs. Long-term: "What were the immediate versus lasting impacts?"
The "Why" Ladder Progressively deeper understanding:
Why did you choose that approach?
Why was that important?
Why did others agree/disagree?
Why did you prioritize X over Y?
Listen Actively
Take notes on specific phrases
Notice emphasis and omissions
Watch for non-verbal cues
Use Their Language
Reference their specific terms
Build questions from their phrasing
Show you're tracking their narrative
Maintain Flow
Keep questions conversational
Build on previous answers
Use bridging phrases: "You mentioned... tell me more about that”
Know When to Switch
After 2-3 levels of follow-ups
When you've uncovered a clear pattern
If responses become repetitive
When you have enough signal
Primary: "Tell me about a time you challenged your team's assumptions about what the customer wanted."
Follow-up chain:
"How did you identify the gap between assumptions and reality?"
"What research or evidence did you gather?"
"How did you influence the team to reconsider?"
"What was the final impact on the customer?"
Primary: "Describe a time when you were faced with a complex problem or feature."
Follow-up chain:
"How did you decide what was essential?"
"What process guided your simplification?"
"How did you handle stakeholder disagreements?"
"What were the long-term consequences?"
Primary: "Tell me about a time when your curiosity led you to explore something beyond your immediate responsibilities."
Follow-up chain:
"What sparked your interest?"
"How did you pursue this learning?"
"How did you convince others of its value?"
"What challenges arose in implementation?"
Primary: "Describe a time when you had to align conflicting stakeholder priorities."
Follow-up chain:
"What were the key points of disagreement?"
"How did you discover the underlying concerns?"
"What process did you use to build alignment?"
"How did this affect team dynamics going forward?"